NABITA 2014. . John D. Byrnes This Threat Assessment Tool is being shared as a free resource to commemorate the launch of the National Behavioral . BITs can assess their . The NaBITA Threat Assessment Tool ("Tool") was first introduced in 2009. $1,099. MODERATE RISK - More involved or repeated disruption. The SIVRA . Risk Assessment Tools including SIVRA-35 . Disturbed or advancing to dysregulation. Casper College has chosen to use the NaBITA Threat Assessment Tool for guidance. Threat likely to be repeated with consistency (may try to convince listener they are serious) Members stay up-to-date on the latest news, research, case law, and other developments impacting . The purpose of the threat assessment procedures is to provide guidelines for threat assessment on the Piedmont Virginia Community College (PVCC) campus and identify resources, programs, procedures and safeguards that will ensure the safety and security of the PVCC community. NaBITA THREAT ASSESSMENT TOOL Threat Assessment in the Campus Setting THE NaBITA 2009 WHITEPAPER Brett A. Sokolow, J.D. (See the NaBITA Index scale, Appendix B) Step 6: Continue a full inquiry of the threat and make appropriate assessments. Unlimited individual members (sub-users) with full access. The tool should be used in conjunction with further training and study. This process is based on the severity of the concern, the ability of the person in question to engage in the resolution and the situation. It now commands respect as the tool most commonly used by campus behavioral intervention and The Tool provides a rubric for behavioral and risk evaluation and helps create a common language for Behavioral Intervention Teams ("BITs"). Behavior more -level disturbance Possible threat made or perceived Threat is vague and indirect Information about threat or threat itselfis inconsistent, Threat lacks realism Content of threat suggests threatener is unlikely to carry it out Certifications and training courses are led by top practitioners in their fields. NaBITA THREAT ASSESSMENT TOOL NaBITA .org CLASSIFYING RISK INTERVENTION TOOLS TO ADDRESS RISK AS CLASSIFIED MILD RISK - Disruptive or concerning behavior. NaBITA Risk Rubric D-SCALE Life Stress and Emotional Health DECOMPENSATING Behavior is severely disruptive, directly impacts others, and is actively dangerous. This may include life-threatening, self-injurious behaviors such as: Suicidal ideations or attempts, an expressed lethal plan, and/or hospitalization and/or significantly off baseline. No threat made or present More involved or repeated disruption. 5 Threat Assessment in the Campus SettingA Publication of NaBITA.ORGJanuary 2009 Measuring Aggression The third rubric that contributes to this Threat Assessment Tool provides the capacity for campus behavioral intervention teams to assess the potential for harm to others through the lens of aggression. 2 THREAT ASSESSMENT IN THE CAMPUS SETTING Introduction The NaBITA Threat Assessment Tool ("Tool") was first introduced in 2009. 5 Threat Assessment in the Campus SettingA Publication of NaBITA.ORGJanuary 2009 Measuring Aggression The third rubric that contributes to this Threat Assessment Tool provides the capacity for campus behavioral intervention teams to assess the potential for harm to others through the lens of aggression.

Behaviorally disruptive, unusual Threat made or present. Behaviorally disruptive, unusual Threat made or present. Interventions include but are not limited to: Monitor the situation; Engage with the person to de-escalate Brian Van Brunt, Ed.D. Behavior more concerning. The NABITA Risk Rubric The NABITA Risk Rubric is a research-based expert system tool useful for the initial triaging of mental health concerns and the potential for threat. Membership Benefits Super/K-12 Super $4,999 Recognizing the value of identifying risk early and intervening to prevent harm to members of the campus community, most colleges and universities in the United States today have teams in place tasked with doing just that. Step 5: Assess the level of the threat through the NaBITA Threat Assessment Tool and classify the threat on the Mental and Behavioral Health scale, the Generalized Risk scale, and the Nine Levels of Aggression. Disturbed or advancing to dysregulation. Behavior more -level disturbance Possible threat made or perceived Threat is vague and indirect Information about threat or threat itselfis inconsistent, Threat lacks realism Content of threat suggests threatener is unlikely to carry it out To equip behavioral No threat made or present More involved or repeated disruption. services, parental notification, law enforcement notification, psychological assessment, as well as sanctions within the Student Code of Conduct. and/or significantly off baseline. Threat is vague, but direct, or specific but indirect. A starting place for this would be reading this article , flowchart or contacting the author Brian Van Brunt. Examples of documents are also included such as agendas, reports, Risk Assessment Tools including SIVRA-35, Looking Glass, ERIS, Risk Rubric, and Non-Clinical Assessment of Suicide . The Assessment of a Behavioral Intervention Teams: CORE-Q10.

- Student may or may not show signs of distress. The NaBITA Threat Assessment Tool is a researched based expert system tool used for the initial triaging of mental health concerns and the potential for threat. Members have access to a myriad of valuable resources to avoid reinventing the wheel, ensure best practices, participate in exclusive professional development opportunities, and improve your behavioral intervention and threat assessment proficiency. To view this resource, please log in as a member. The NaBITA Risk Rubric is most effective when used in coordination with other BIT Stan-dards of Practice (Van Brunt, Schiemann, Pescara-Kovach, Murphy & Halligan-Avery, 2018) and paired with other assessment tools and resources such as the SIVRA-35, The National Association for Behavioral Intervention and Threat Assessment is committed to providing education, development, and support to professionals .

.pdf, the NaBITA Threat Assessment Tool (2014) and Buffalo State College Behavior Assessment Committee Threat Assessment Rubric. Threat made or present Threat is vague, but direct, or specific but indirect Likely to be repeated or shared with multiple reporters Information about threat or threat itself is consistent, plausible or includes increasing detail of a plan (time, place, etc.) - No threat made or present. Learn NABITA's various tools to perform violence risk assessments: VRAWW, SIVRA-35, and NAS. 2014 NABITA Threat Assessment Tool.pdf. Access everything you need for your NABITA training or event here. Threat is vague, but direct, or specific but indirect. The Standards Self-Assessment Tool (SSAT) is provided as a tool to complement the 2018 NaBITA Standards for Behavioral Intervention Teams. The Structured Interview for Violence Risk Assessment (SIVRA-35) is a 35-item inventory that is used to assist behavioral intervention team members and clinical staff in conducting a more thorough and research-based violence risk assessment. OVERVIEW Threat is vague, but direct, or specific but indirect Likely to be repeated or shared with multiple reporters Information about threat or threat itself is consistent, plausible or includes increasing detail of a plan (time, place, etc.) - Threat made or present - Threat is vague and indirect, but may be repeated or shared with multiple reporters - Information about threat or threat itself is inconsistent, implausible or lacks detail - Threat lacks realism, or is repeated with variations - Content of threat suggests threatener is unlikely to carry it out. W. Scott Lewis, J.D. Non-Clinical Assessment of Suicide Tool. There is no substitute for a clinically trained psychologist, licensed . SEVERE RISK Carolyn Reinach Wolf, Esq. violence and threat assessment and provides an objective, evidence-based risk rating for cases.

To equip behavioral For one-year per Higher Education Institution, K-12 School or District, Organization, or Workplace. The tool should be used in conjunction with further training and study. This expert system does not predict suicide, but rather offers non-clinically trained staff a list of questions to ask an individual to help gauge their overall risk level of suicide and makes recommendations for interventions. Threat likely to be repeated with consistency (may try to convince listener they are serious) Once an incident is reported to the BIT, members of the Committee determine the appropriate steps to address the situation. ers). Access to ten 20-Minutes-to.Trained video modules. Threat likely to be repeated with consistency (may try to Threat is vague, but direct, or specific but indirect Likely to be repeated or shared with multiple reporters Information about threat or threat itself is consistent, plausible or includes increasing detail of a plan (time, place, etc.) This article presents the updated NaBITA Tool as a straightforward, easily understood, broadly applicable model of threat assessment specifically designed to be applied by campus behavioral intervention teams.2 2 The prominent and widespread adoption of the NaBITA Tool does not let teams off the hook for identifying NABITA is the premier association for behavioral intervention teams and training. .pdf, the NaBITA Threat Assessment Tool (2014) and Buffalo State College Behavior Assessment Committee Threat Assessment Rubric. Electronic access to 2 NABITA books published prior to current calendar year. Team. The Tool provides a rubric for behavioral and risk evaluation and helps create a common language for Behavioral Intervention Teams ("BITs"). and records, threat assessment tools, interventions, and quality assurance. But simply forming a Behavioral Intervention Team is not enough. NABITA By The Numbers 4,200 Active Members 10,001 Certifications Awarded 22 Leading Subject Matter Experts 5 Assessment Tools Training and certification courses led by experts. likely distressed or low-level disturbance possible threat made or perceived threat is vague and indirect information about threat or threat itself is inconsistent, implausible or lacks detail threat lacks realism content of threat suggests threatener is unlikely to carry it out disruptive or concerning behavior may or may not show